Property with mobile shingles made between 01 01 1999 and 12 31 2007 at gaf s mobile al plant.
Timberline roof shingles lawsuit.
Settlements have been reached with building materials corporation of america known as gaf materials corp gaf involving timberline roofing shingles shingles.
The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that shingles manufactured from january 1 1999 through december 31 2007 at a gaf plant in mobile alabama and from january 1 1998 through december 31 2009 at all other gaf manufacturing.
In 2013 a major legal action took place with the claim that shingles have been prematurely cracking and failing on thousands of roofs due to material and manufacturing defects.
If you own a property with gaf timberline roofing shingles made between 1998 and 2009 then you may be eligible to receive free replacement shingles or a cash payment from the gaf timberline shingles class action lawsuit.
The lawsuit covers two classes covering.
Property with non mobile shingles made between 01 01 1998 and 12 31 2009 at other gaf plants.
You may be eligible if you own property with gaf timberline roofing shingles manufactured between 1998 and 2009.
The timberline shingles were installed fifteen years prior to when the claim is made and the claim is made within one year from the effective date of the mobile settlement.
The class member provides documentation that 10 of all timberline shingles on his roof are cracked.
Gaf timberline roof shingles class action settlement.
If granted final approval the gaf timberline shingles settlements will resolve multiple class action lawsuits consolidated as in re.
Property owners who experienced problems including premature cracking with their gaf timberline shingles may have legal recourse.
This is a summary of a recent large class action shingles lawsuit against gaf timberline shingles.
According to this lawsuit gaf timberline shingles are allegedly defective and do not last.
Of america asphalt roofing shingle products liability litigation that allege the shingles are defective and do not last.
The alleged defect may make them prone to premature cracking splitting or tearing plaintiffs claim.